Facebook Instagram Twitter LinkedIn Client login

COVID-19 Healthcare Challenge - a test in time saves nine

19th June 2020 by Anne Sakoane

Author: Ricky Tsang, Senior Scientific Advisor

“Test, test, test”.

That was the powerful message from the Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) on 16th March 20201, exactly 1 week before the UK went into lockdown. But why is testing so important? What happens if there is not enough testing? And how can testing be carried out efficiently?

The SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 has torn its way across the world. The fact that this is a new virus we know very little about, makes it that much harder to study, to understand and to overcome. But something that helps in this pandemic, and any other pandemic, is testing. Testing instantly lights up the coronavirus’ location on a map like a beacon and tells us two things:

  •         who is infected? - we can immediately isolate positive cases, reduce exposure to others and slow the spread of disease.
  •      how is it spreading? - we can adequately prepare healthcare services and implement suitable public health policies, again, to ensure the virus is contained.

Without testing, we don’t know where the coronavirus is, how far it has spread or how to effectively stop it. In these cases, communities are essentially forced to implement blanket-wide quarantines in an attempt to slow the spread of the coronavirus: if we cannot physically interact with others, the coronavirus also cannot physically interact with others.

Socioeconomic considerations

This may sound like an effective strategy, but it has been argued that these large-scale non-pharmaceutical interventions might have lasting societal and economic implications2. To combat this, widescale testing can help alleviate those pressures.

So, we know that testing is important and in an ideal world, we would want to test anyone and everyone. But realistically that would be almost impossible; there would be a physical limit on the number of tests available and a limit on the capacity of testing facilities.

Then who should be tested?

There is no doubt that we first need to test those who present with symptoms. Then, we should proactively test those who symptomatic patients had contact with as there is a possibility that they might be asymptomatic but still unknowingly transmit the virus. Positive cases identified from the second round of testing should then be isolated. This is the basis of ‘contact tracing’ also known as ‘test and trace’, a technique implemented in many countries including South Korea, Italy and now England4. The solution usually takes the form of a digital app that runs in the background of your smartphone and you will be alerted if someone with a COVID-19 diagnosis has been in sufficiently close contact with you (the functionality of these apps varies).

By implementing contact tracing supplemented with widescale testing, communities are able to take a more targeted approach to disease management, help redirect healthcare services and resources appropriately, and ultimately ensure that the virus is contained and healthcare systems are not overwhelmed (in other words, to flatten the curve).

Find out more and stay informed with the latest guidance on testing and contact tracing in the UK. And remember to stay safe!

  1. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---16-march-2020
  2. Flaxman, S., Mishra, S., Gandy, A. et al. Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe. Nature (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7
  3. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/nhs-test-and-trace-how-it-works [accessed June 2020]
  4. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-contact-tracing [accessed June 2020]